Quality assessment of weekend discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Hospital bed utility and length of stay affect the healthcare budget and quality of patient care. Prior studies already show admission and operation on weekends have higher mortality rates compared with weekdays, which has been identified as the 'weekend effect.' However, discharges on weekends are also linked with quality of care, and have been evaluated in the recent decade with different dimensions. This meta-analysis aims to discuss weekend discharges associated with 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, 30-day emergency department visits and 14-day follow-up visits compared with weekday discharges. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from January 2000 to November 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Only studies published in English were reviewed. The random-effects model was applied to assess the effects of heterogeneity among the selected studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Year of publication, country, sample size, number of weekday/weekend discharges, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, 30-day ED visits and 14-day appointment follow-up rate. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: There are 20 studies from seven countries, including 13 articles from America, in the present meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in odds ratio (OR) in 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, 30-day ED visit, and 14-day follow-up between weekday and weekend. However, the OR for 30-day readmission was significantly higher among patients in the USA, including studies with high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: In the USA, the 30-day readmission rate was higher in patients who had been discharged on the weekend compared with the weekday. However, interpretation should be cautious because of data limitation and high heterogeneity. Further intervention should be conducted to eliminate any healthcare inequality within the healthcare system and to improve the quality of patient care.

Initial Emergency Department Visit and Follow-Up Care for Concussions among Children with Medicaid.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rates and patterns of initial emergency department (ED) encounters and follow-up care for concussions among Medicaid-insured children before and after the 2013 enactment of Ohio concussion law. STUDY DESIGN: Using a time-series design, this study analyzed concussion claim data obtained from Partners for Kids, a pediatric accountable-care organization in Ohio. A total of 12 512 concussions and 48 238 associated claims for services between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2017, with an initial ED encounter among Medicaid-insured children (ages 0-18 years) were analyzed. The effect of the law on the odds of follow-up care were assessed using generalized estimating equations models, adjusted for sex, age group, and residence location. RESULTS: Of the total 12 512 concussions, 63.9% occurred in male patients, 70.1% in patients ages 10-18 years, and 65.2% in patients from urban areas. The rate of initial ED encounters for concussions increased from 2008 to 2014 (2.8 to 4.9 per 10 000 members), followed by a decrease in 2016 (4.2 per 10 000 members). A significant increase in follow-up care after the initial ED encounter was observed from pre-law to post-law (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.61, 1.86). A shift in follow-up care was observed from radiology and ambulance services in pre-law to primary care providers in post-law. CONCLUSIONS: The Ohio concussion law may have influenced the patterns of initial ED visit and follow-up care for concussions among Medicaid-insured children. Future studies evaluating the impact of the law should analyze the utilization patterns among children with various insurance/payment types.

The right to aftercare: identifying the responsible bodies.

In the second article on the right to aftercare under the Mental Health Act 1983 , section 117, Richard Griffith considers the identification of the body responsible and whether patients can be charged for their aftercare.

The right to aftercare: best endeavours.

In this two-part article Richard Griffith, Senior Lecturer in Health Law at Swansea University, considers a detained mental health patient's right to aftercare under the Mental Health Act 1983, section 117.

The Philippines rolls back advancements in the postabortion care policy.

In 2018, the Philippines announced a postabortion care policy that rolls back crucial safeguards aimed at protecting women who seek medical treatment for postabortion complications from discrimination and abuse. It replaces another policy that was introduced in 2016, following years of advocacy by national and international advocates who were concerned about the mistreatment of women seeking postabortion care due to discriminatory practices in the health system and abortion stigma. The new policy is narrower in scope than the previous policy and reinforces abortion stigma by emphasizing the legal prohibition on abortion, failing to clarify that women seeking postabortion care need not be reported to the authorities, and not recognizing the availability of complaint mechanisms for women who are mistreated. These and other crucial gaps put the new policy at risk of being in violation of ethical standards of medical care and guarantees of human rights.

A guide to community mental health law for district nurses: the right to aftercare.

District nurses frequently provide physical care and treatment to patients in their own homes and care homes who have previously been detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 for the treatment of a mental illness. Such patients are commonly subject to community provisions of the Mental Health Act 1983 and it is important that districts nurses are aware of the implications of these provisions on the patients care and support. In this article the author considers a detained mental health patient's right to aftercare under the Mental Health Act 1983, section 117.

The Philippines' new postabortion care policy.

In 2000, a Philippine policy clarifying the legality of medical treatment for women with postabortion complications was introduced to address unsafe abortion as a leading cause of maternal death, and reports of discrimination and abuse by healthcare providers against women who had abortions illegally. Despite its initial success as a pilot program, the policy's implementation and expansion were not prioritized. The incidence of unsafe abortion has increased over the years and, in 2009, the right to postabortion care was codified in national law, yet the mistreatment and abuse of women has continued in violation of medical ethics and the law. In 2016, following the demands of advocates and recommendations from national and international human rights bodies, the government introduced a new policy to strengthen the national framework for postabortion care, clarifying the legal and ethical duties of health service providers and offering women formal avenues for redress against abuse. The new policy offers useful guidance for countries that are contemplating new ways to strengthen the quality of postabortion care services in accordance with recognized standards of medical ethics and human rights.

[Postdonation information: the French fourth hemovigilance sub-process]. / L'information post-don, le quatrième sous-processus de l'hémovigilance.

Postdonation information is the knowledge of information about the donor or his donation, occurring after it, which challenges quality or safety of the blood products stemming from this or other donations. Classical hemovigilance sub-processes concerning donors or recipients adverse events do not cover this topic. France is just about to make it official as a fourth sub-process. Less formal management of postdonation information is already set up for more than ten years. French data of the year 2013 are presented, including the regional notification level and the national reporting one. A significant level of heterogeneity is observed as for other hemovigilance sub-processes. It is mainly due to subjective rather than objective differences in risk appreciation. A real consensual work is expected about it in the future.

Parenting in recovery program: participant responses and case examples.

Approximately 80% of children served by child welfare agencies have parents who abuse or are dependent on alcohol or illicit drugs. Despite the devastating effects on children from living in substance abusing families, child protective service practitioners have limited options available to assist these families. The Parenting in Recovery program was created to address the needs of substance-abusing mothers involved in child welfare. This manuscript describes this program and perceptions of participants concerning its effectiveness.

Using the level of Service Inventory-Revised to improve assessment and treatment in drug court.

More than 2,000 drug courts in the United States provide supervision and substance-abuse treatment to thousands of offenders. Yet the treatment continuum from assessment to aftercare is underexplored. The effectiveness of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) as a risk assessment tool is well established. However, fewer studies have considered its use in guiding treatment strategies. In using the LSI-R, the drug court program relied on the structured interview protocol (not the risk classification scores) to identify criminogenic needs that then helped determine placement in a high- or low-needs treatment track. To evaluate the effectiveness of these treatment placement decisions, this research used the LSI-R scores to examine individual and group differences (N = 182). Significant and substantive differences at the individual and group levels were found thus providing empirical support for using the LSI-R as a link between assessment and treatment. Implications for developing standards and practice protocols for drug courts are discussed.